/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) political discourse (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: political discourse
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt40 - : In a recent discussion on how the term "illiteracy" is used in the United States political discourse to justify particular forms of intervention in the life of individuals Clair and Sandlin (2004) argue that: "To be considered illiterate in contemporary America is not just to struggle with reading and writing - it is to be deemed unworthy, unproductive, a bad parent, and deserving remarkably high levels of domestic intervention" (p .46). Clair and Sandlin's argument demands critical examination in the present time of educational and welfare reform in the United States. Latino families are at the epicenter of the national political agendas, namely the current educational reform No Child Left Behind, with a strong call for school-family partnership focusing on issues of literacy, as well as the Workforce Investment Act, (1998) in which policymakers emphasize the need for a connection between adult education and work force development (Huerta-Macías, 2002).
2
paper VE_Letrastxt93 - : The rhetoric of tradition in Venezuelan political discourse: the cult of heroes
3
paper corpusSignostxt412 - : Strategic functions of metaphor networks on political discourse: An Hugo Chavez interactional discourse analysis
4
paper corpusSignostxt266 - : Santibáñez, C. (2007). Sayings in political discourse: Argumentative and rhetorical uses . En F. van Eemeren, A. Blair, Ch. Willard & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1227-1232). Amsterdam: Sic Sat. [ [54]Links ]
5
paper corpusSignostxt382 - : Drawing on these distinctions, we can say that political discourse is enacted, among other discourses, by parliamentary discourse, that "displays particular institutionalised discursive features and ritualised interaction strategies" (Ilie, 2010c: 62 ). Parliamentary discourse is therefore a particular genre of political discourse, which in its turn displays several subgenres (Ilie, 2010a: 8-9), the debate being one of them. A debate is "a formal discussion on a particular topic and which is strictly controlled by an institutional set of rules and a moderator, who in Parliament is the Speaker or the President" (Ilie, 2010a: 10), therefore a mediated discourse, whose major strength is "the necessity of confrontation" and "the existence of opposite sides" (Ilie, 2010a: 10).
6
paper corpusSignostxt426 - : Deixis plays an important role in political discourse, where it has been studied “ranging from personal to political, from persuasive to manipulative”, taking into account “both the context of production and the speaker’s intentions” (Adetunji, 2006: 181 ). Interestingly, the major number of these studies is devoted to the use of person deixis by politicians, as “the ambiguous use of pronominal deixis is especially relevant in political language” (Arroyo, 2000: 4). Mainly, their focus is on the role of first-person plural deictic pronouns (Petersoo, 2007). It has been argued that they may play a powerful persuasive role “since they have the potential to encode group memberships and identifications” (Zupnik, 1994: 340) by indexing different groups as included or excluded in the pronoun we (Mulderrig, 2012). As a result, Zupnik (1994) points out the crucial role in the analysis of vague deixis using the example of one interlocutor’s responses in a televised political speech event. She argues
7
paper corpusSignostxt421 - : The written language of the posters analysed shows the characteristics of political discourse, whose main purpose is to persuade the audience to vote for Fianna Fáil: use of ellipsis, positive language, repetitions, and short phrases are the main features of the slogans found in the posters . In this sense, the different slogans and the visual representation of Bertie Ahern and Micheál Martin as secure political leaders suggest the idea of Ireland as a European country that was in a process of socio-economic development in Europe and whose expansion was progressively growing.
Evaluando al candidato political discourse:
2) deixis: 4 (*)
3) ilie: 4
political discourse
Lengua: eng
Frec: 106
Docs: 42
Nombre propio: / 106 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.539 = (1 + (1+3.16992500144231) / (1+6.74146698640115)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| political discourse |
: Adetunji, A. (2006). Inclusion and exclusion in political discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo’s Speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 177-191. : Aponte Moreno, M. (2008). Metaphors in Hugo Chavez’s Political Discourse: Conceptulizing Nation, Revolution and Opposition. Tesis doctoral, Unviversidad de Nueva York, Nueva York, Estados Unidos. : Bolívar, A. (2018). Political discourse as dialogue. A Latin American perspective. London, New York: Routledge. : Chilton, P & Ilyin, M. (1993). Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’. Discourse & Society, 4(1), 7-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004001002 : Chilton, P. & Schèaffner, C. (Eds.) (2002). Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse. Theory and practice. London & New York: Routledge. : Chilton, P., & Schaffner, C. (2002). Introduction. Themes and principies in the analysis of political discourse. En P. Chilton & C. Schaffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk. Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 1-41). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : Clair, R., and Sandlin, J.A. (2004). Incompetence and intrusion: On the methaphorical use of illiteracy in U.S. Political discourse. Adult Basic Education, 14(1), 45-59. : Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advanced Students. London and New York: Routledge. : Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Routledge. : Fairclough, N., & Fairclough, I. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. A method for advanced students. London & New York: Routledge. : Fetzer, A. & Lauerbach, G. E. (Eds.). (2007). Political discourse in the media. Cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : Galasiński, D. & Skowronek, K. (2001). Naming the nation. A critical analysis of names in Polish political discourse. Political Communication, 18(1), 51-66. : Gastil, J. (1992). Undemocratic discourse: A review of theory and research on political discourse. Discourse and Society, 3(4), 469-500. : Gelabert-Desnoyer, J. (2008). Not so impersonal: Intentionality in the use of pronoun uno in contemporary Spanish political discourse. Pragmatics, 18(3), 407-424. : Horvath, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s political discourse. Language, Literature and Culture in Changing Transatlantic World, International Conference Proceedings (pp. 22-23). University Library of Presov University. : Howe, N. (1988). Metaphor in Contemporary American Political Discourse. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3(2), 87-104. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms0302_2 : In his turn, Maalej (2013) in the study of Hosni Mubarak’s political discourse discovers the tendency to use more royal-we than inclusive we. : Johnston, A. (2006). Methodologies for the study of political advertising. In L.L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), The Sage handbook of political discourse (pp. 15-34). London: Sage. : Marín Arrese, J. I. (2009). Effective vs. epistemic stance, and subjectivity/intersubjectivity in political discourse. A case study. In A. Tsangalidis & R. Facchinetti (Eds.), Studies on English modality. In honour of Frank R. Palmer (pp. 23-52). Bern: Peter Lang . : Musolff, A. (2009). Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. : Ndambuki, J., & Janks, H. (2010). Political discourse, women's voices: Mismatches in representation. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 4, 73-92. : Ochieng, D., Oketch, O. & Hameed, A. (2016). Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragil, and Failed Democracies. USA: Information Science Reference. : Shäffner, C. & Bassnett, S. (2010). Political discourse, media and translation. Newcastle upon Type: Cambridge Scholars Publishers. : The problem of inclusion / exclusion of personal deictic pronouns in political discourse has been fully covered by Rees (1983) in his pronominal scale: : Wilson, J. (2001). Political discourse. En D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 398-415). Oxford: Blackwell. : Wodak, R. (1989). Language, power and ideology. Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. : Wodak, R. (2012). Politics as Usual: Investigating Political Discourse in Action. In IP Gee & M. Handford (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 525-540). London and New York: Routledge Handbooks. : Zupnik, Y. (1994). A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 339-383. : van Dijk, T. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? En, Blommaert, J. y Bulcaen, C. (Comp.) Political linguistics (pp. 11-52). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. : van Dijk, T. (1998). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11-52. [114]https://doi.org/10.1075/bil.11.03dii |